Security Audit
Feb 26, 2025
Version 1.0.0
Presented by 0xMacro
This document includes the results of the security audit for Seven Seas's smart contract code as found in the section titled ‘Source Code’. The security audit performed by the Macro security team over multiple days starting February 21st.
The purpose of this audit is to review the source code of certain Seven Seas Solidity contracts, and provide feedback on the design, architecture, and quality of the source code with an emphasis on validating the correctness and security of the software in its entirety.
Disclaimer: While Macro’s review is comprehensive and has surfaced some changes that should be made to the source code, this audit should not solely be relied upon for security, as no single audit is guaranteed to catch all possible bugs.
The following is an aggregation of issues found by the Macro Audit team:
Severity | Count | Acknowledged | Won't Do | Addressed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Medium | 2 | - | - | 2 |
Low | 2 | - | - | 2 |
Code Quality | 3 | - | - | 3 |
Seven Seas was quick to respond to these issues.
Our understanding of the specification was based on the following sources:
Some of the reviewed decoders allow Boring Vaults to interact with protocols controlled by multisig wallets that can update important state variables or upgrade the contract to a new version. It is trusted that the owners of this mulitsig will act in the interest of users. It should be understood that a loss of Boring Vault funds is possible if these wallets act maliciously.
The following source code was reviewed during the audit:
3b4600e77b8c9ef2c688e8b22399d2a31c9ef531
Source Code | SHA256 |
---|---|
src/base/DecodersAndSanitizers/Protocols/SpectraDecoderAndSanitizer.sol |
|
1ac1f8f3a6fb88abac800a0099f42603a050b541
Source Code | SHA256 |
---|---|
src/base/DecodersAndSanitizers/Protocols/ResolvDecoderAndSanitizer.sol |
|
d7211fbfaa54fcc389faa52dfdf73928391984c3
Source Code | SHA256 |
---|---|
src/base/DecodersAndSanitizers/Protocols/UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer.sol |
|
0d5b647d06dc43c32efb87bb586db82bea04e2d2
Source Code | SHA256 |
---|---|
src/base/DecodersAndSanitizers/Protocols/EulerEVKDecoderAndSanitizer.sol |
|
Note: This document contains an audit solely of the Solidity contracts listed above. Specifically, the audit pertains only to the contracts themselves, and does not pertain to any other programs or scripts, including deployment scripts.
Click on an issue to jump to it, or scroll down to see them all.
modifyLiquidities
function only sanitizes first two actions
execute
function only sanitizes first three actions
modifyLiquidities
might lead to unwanted execution
redeem
function
redeem
function
SWAP_EXACT_IN_SINGLE
swaps
We quantify issues in three parts:
This third part – the severity level – is a summary of how much consideration the client should give to fixing the issue. We assign severity according to the table of guidelines below:
Severity | Description |
---|---|
(C-x) Critical |
We recommend the client must fix the issue, no matter what, because not fixing would mean significant funds/assets WILL be lost. |
(H-x) High |
We recommend the client must address the issue, no matter what, because not fixing would be very bad, or some funds/assets will be lost, or the code’s behavior is against the provided spec. |
(M-x) Medium |
We recommend the client to seriously consider fixing the issue, as the implications of not fixing the issue are severe enough to impact the project significantly, albiet not in an existential manner. |
(L-x) Low |
The risk is small, unlikely, or may not relevant to the project in a meaningful way. Whether or not the project wants to develop a fix is up to the goals and needs of the project. |
(Q-x) Code Quality |
The issue identified does not pose any obvious risk, but fixing could improve overall code quality, on-chain composability, developer ergonomics, or even certain aspects of protocol design. |
(I-x) Informational |
Warnings and things to keep in mind when operating the protocol. No immediate action required. |
(G-x) Gas Optimizations |
The presented optimization suggestion would save an amount of gas significant enough, in our opinion, to be worth the development cost of implementing it. |
modifyLiquidities
function only sanitizes first two actions
In UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer
, the modifyLiquidities
function allows for adding, removing, and modifying liquidity on UniswapV4 pools. It allows for batching multiple actions that are encoded in the first argument:
function modifyLiquidities(bytes calldata unlockData, uint256 /*deadline*/) external view returns (bytes memory addressesFound) {
// First decode the outer tuple (actions, params)
(bytes memory actions, bytes[] memory params) = abi.decode(unlockData, (bytes, bytes[]));
Reference: UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer.sol#L56
However, only actions[0]
and actions[1]
are sanitized, and the function lacks a check to prevent additional actions from being passed in the unlockData
argument. As a result, any additional actions encoded in unlockData can be executed without any sanitization.
Remediation to Consider
It is recommended to restrict the execution only to supported action sequence. Thus, consider adding a check to only allow the required number of actions passed to the function.
execute
function only sanitizes first three actions
Similar to M-1, the UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer’s
execute
function only sanitizes the first three actions. Any additional actions being passed in inputs[0]
remain unsanitized.
Remediation to Consider
Restrict the execution only to supported action sequence. Thus, consider adding a check to only allow the required number of actions passed to the function.
Currently, the spectra decoder implements only the basic deposit
function without slippage protection:
function deposit(uint256 /*amount*/, address receiver)
Remediation to Consider
Add the deposit
function with slippage protection to avoid receiving less tokens than expected.
modifyLiquidities
might lead to unwanted execution
In UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer
, modifyLiquidities
misses certain checks that would ensure only supported sequences of actions are allowed. Specifically, it's recommended to add verification for:
MINT_POSITION
operation, check that actions[1]
is SETTLE_PAIR
before decoding params[1]
INCREASE_LIQUIDITY
, DECREASE_LIQUIDITY
, and BURN_POSITION
operations, the tokenId
is encoded in params[0]
to identify the specific pool for execution. However, this is not sanitized. The PositionManager’s getPoolAndPositionInfo
could be called to receive the PoolKey
and sanitize it’s addresses.INCREASE_LIQUIDITY
/DECREASE_LIQUIDITY
operation when using sub-actions CLOSE_CURRENCY
or CLEAR_OR_TAKE
, check for actions[2] == CLOSE_CURRENCY
and actions[2] == CLEAR_OR_TAKE
BURN_POSITION
operation, check that actions[2] == TAKE_PAIR
redeem
function
The spectra decoder currently implements redeemIBT
to redeem interest-bearing tokens (IBT), but lacks support for the redeem
function that would allow redeeming the underlying token.
Remediation to Consider
Add the redeem function with slippage protection to the decoder.
redeem
function
The Resolv decoder implements requestBurn
, which burns USR
and returns USDC
once completeBurn
is called by a trusted entity. The Resolv protocol also offers a redeem function that burns USR tokens and returns USDC immediately in a single transaction.
Remediation to Consider
Implement the redeem
function to support burning USR and receiving back USDC in a single transaction.
SWAP_EXACT_IN_SINGLE
swaps
In UniswapV4DecoderAndSanitizer
, the execute
function enables swapping via the UniversalRouter contract. Currently, the function only supports "Exact Input Swaps." To increase flexibility, implementing additional swap types—such as "Exact Output Swaps"—would be beneficial.
Remediation to Consider
Implement support for additional swap actions.
Macro makes no warranties, either express, implied, statutory, or otherwise, with respect to the services or deliverables provided in this report, and Macro specifically disclaims all implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, noninfringement and those arising from a course of dealing, usage or trade with respect thereto, and all such warranties are hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Macro will not be liable for any lost profits, business, contracts, revenue, goodwill, production, anticipated savings, loss of data, or costs of procurement of substitute goods or services or for any claim or demand by any other party. In no event will Macro be liable for consequential, incidental, special, indirect, or exemplary damages arising out of this agreement or any work statement, however caused and (to the fullest extent permitted by law) under any theory of liability (including negligence), even if Macro has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
The scope of this report and review is limited to a review of only the code presented by the Seven Seas team and only the source code Macro notes as being within the scope of Macro’s review within this report. This report does not include an audit of the deployment scripts used to deploy the Solidity contracts in the repository corresponding to this audit. Specifically, for the avoidance of doubt, this report does not constitute investment advice, is not intended to be relied upon as investment advice, is not an endorsement of this project or team, and it is not a guarantee as to the absolute security of the project. In this report you may through hypertext or other computer links, gain access to websites operated by persons other than Macro. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference and convenience only, and are the exclusive responsibility of such websites’ owners. You agree that Macro is not responsible for the content or operation of such websites, and that Macro shall have no liability to your or any other person or entity for the use of third party websites. Macro assumes no responsibility for the use of third party software and shall have no liability whatsoever to any person or entity for the accuracy or completeness of any outcome generated by such software.